Hi Pavan,
Could you let me know if I apply cumulative package for SQL 2012, it would work? According to Note 62988, here are minimum version I need for SQL databases.
SQL Server: Minimum Version Support package/CU
SQL Server 2012 11.0.3393 SP1 CU7
SQL Server 2008 R2 10.50.1702 RTM CU1
SQL Server 2008 10.00.2531 (2) SP1
SQL Server 2005 9.00.3042 (**) (1) SP2
SQL Server 2000 8.00.2039 (*) SP4
SQL Server 7 7.00.1063 SP4
Thanks,
Niaz
1. Yes, it is possible to attach Excel file(s) and it can be opened before any approval step within workflow.
2. It is possible to maintain Long text, not limited to any number of words.
3. No, standard system will not popup anything, but specific approvers can be validated with ABAP exit when AR is saved.
4. Approvers are identified as SAP users and not as HR mini-master records. Not every HR record is created as SAP user, and standard workflow operates in terms of SAP users. Anyway the mapping is normally maintained in the Info Type 0105 (Communication) SubType 0001.
dear
good day
you can use T-code CA85N Mass replacement: work center to display the material BOMS and work center
report o/p
Hi Carsten,
Use the below line
value:{path:'status',formatter:'oController.status'}
Thanks and Regards,Venkatesh
Hi Srivats,
Maybe you can review the Claim process first, please have a look at this thread: Claim Management Process
The Claim (once approved) will increase your Planned cost, but that has nothing to do with a budget consumption and availability control.
You can interpret claims as Change Documents to project cost Planning! You question means that you do not understand the process.
Hope that helps,
Suggest you have your user restart the PC or log off his session to stop any running processes.
If all else fails, restart the SQL server
Dear All,
how to refer to the single element of itab? For example in order to compare two single elements in two different internal tables.
How do you see this table?
I do not see _SYS_BIC schema in the catalog with my HCP trial account 
Hello,
I am writing a custom report utilizing PNPCE. I have created a report category with PNPPERNR as the only input selection and need to allow only the PREMP search help to be used. Any help with how to do this will be greatly appreciated and points will be awarded.
Thanks in advance.
Pat
That's exactly what I needed...thanks!
Would it help if I posted my test code and a sample report?
I'm just trying to confirm that the .Net Crystal Report Viewer Web control supports optional parameters.
Hi Friends,
I'm calling a transactions sequentially one after the other.
scenario:
call transaction 'A' --> get the generated doc. no. --> call another Transaction 'B' --> get another set of data on save --> then call transaction 'C'.
Issue:
After I call transaction 'A' and returned back to program upon saving the transaction, the current LUW is not ending and so the doc. no. not generated after the 1st call.
Pl. provide some suggestions.
Hi Abhi,
What SP or FPs do you have installed on your XI 3.1? I see a few defects in a KBA search for XI 3.1 that have mostly been corrected by SP3.
But I don't see anything specific to just using the structure's details - except when used as a predefined filter in which case the filter itself is built incorrectly.
Does the structure dimension and it's details work as expected outside of WebI?
Thanks,
Carly
Me not even remembering that Personalization isn't possible in 1.2 should reinforce my limited experience with it. 
I've been able to reproduce the issue in my sandbox. I'm uninstalling all the plugins and restarting the MDAS services to see if this alleviates the issue or not. (BTW, I am running 1.3 SP1 on the server I think, I've not tried SP2 just yet since 1.4 is looming)
Hi Arjoon,
Following last week webinar, I went and applied the OSS Note 2084945 for B24 and B26 issue. In the presentation on the page talking about B24 B26 issue, there is a reference to note 1978950.
In this last note, SAP is recommending you remove these two notes from your system
Notes: 1971051 and 1973004
We are currently at HRSP level 79 (6.04), do we have to de-install these two notes? When we tried to de-install them, we got an error message saying the note were obsolete.
Do we have to take any additonal actions?
Thanks for your support!
Nathalie Ann
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for the document, just to confirm, are the JSON-based trace tables also populated when using BRFplus (without DSM)?
Best regards,
M.
Ok guys, figured it out. It was an ABAP syntax 'for all entries in internal table' in my SQL for MSEG in the query that was causing the inconsistent results. I removed that and used an alternate syntax, and voila, the numbers are coming out correctly. So the general logic using GR-ed batches for the vendor, and all movements against them, works just fine. Thanks for all the input, Mahesh and Jurgen. This discussion can be closed.
Update, either the removal of the plugins in fact made this start working again, or it was the required MDAS restart... I'm going to try to reinstall the plugins and see if things break again. If so, I am able to reproduce your issue.
When we go to Travel management->travel expenses->master data->define global settings and put a check next to VAT Refund for trip provision Variant, that seems to affect how the system treats VAT tax calculation. For example a user will enter an receipt and the default tax code is a 16% tax. The user will change the tax code to one that has 0%. It appears the system will accept the 0%, but after the trip is created and sent for approval the 16% tax amount is found in table ptrv_srec-rec_fwste (tax amount).
If we don't have that flag set, when the tax code is changed from 16% to 0% this field has ZERO.
Is this the way it should work?
Thanks
Sandra
Hi Liza,
If not exist routines and filters in dtp, sounds like ods key is consolidates value.
Check your data in datasource.
Regards.